[nmglug] cybermesa dsl
bg
gonzales at thuntek.net
Fri Jul 1 12:04:42 PDT 2005
Doh! This is just great! I have a 678 that didn't seem to be compatible
with thuntek's DMT protocol (it worked fine with CAP), so I was kinda
forced to go with the Actiontek about 6 months ago.
The Actiontek recently displayed a red power LED so Qwest customer
support stepped me through their canned help scripts. The first 2 didn't
work, so I was transferred to their "smart guy". This is what he told me
to do: Unplug all cables. Then repeately unplug and immediately plug in
the power cord *12* times. Thinking I was on candid camera, lente loco
or punk'd, I looked around for a hidden camera. Needless to say, it
didn't work, so with a deposit, they overnighted a new modem that
actually arrived in 2 days.
I hate Qw*st as much as the next guy, but they've really improved
customer support over the past 2 years or so (Qwest wouldn't have have
given a rat's ass before). Ya gotta love how competition (comcast
broadband & cell phones) does to do to fix customer support.
I'll tell you what sucks though: The old modem broke with 2 months
remaining on the warranty. I asked if the new modem would be guaranteed
for the standard year, and they said it would only be good for the term
of the *original* modem. Does that sound right? Oh well, "the new" Qwest
isn't so great after all.
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 17:02 -0600, Andres Paglayan wrote:
> In my case I had three actiontec fried in a row in a three week period.
> All plugged to an stabilizer.
> A friend on mine has his hanging every time he runs netscan stuff.
> I have to ciscos 678 running, one at home for almost 2 years and other
> at work for 3+ years without a single hang,
> enough for me,
>
>
> Ken Long wrote:
>
> >Can you elaborate on the difficulties with the Actiontec? I'm
> >thinking of switching my mother from dial-up to Qwest DSL because the
> >Qwest 256 is only a few dollars more than the MSN she has now.
> >
> >Ken
> >
> >On 29 Jun 2005 at 16:50, comrade wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>I have an actiontec router, and it has options for rfc1483 (not 1318)
> >>bridged or routed, but cybermesa has me using pppoa. oh well. The
> >>actiontec is certainly junk. good luck.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >nmglug mailing list
> >nmglug at nmglug.org
> >http://www.nmglug.org/mailman/listinfo/nmglug
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nmglug mailing list
> nmglug at nmglug.org
> http://www.nmglug.org/mailman/listinfo/nmglug
>
More information about the nmglug
mailing list