[nmglug] Satellite imagery

[Brian O'Keefe]

And here's the image I'm trying to download and work with. Maybe a more 
powerful processor would help? Doubt that tho.

On 11/10/18 5:25 PM, Jonathan Romero wrote:
> You could also ask a company Called Vricon if they have holdings for 
> that date.
>
> Again the right timeline makes it unlikely but you might as well ask.
>
> Check with planet.com <http://planet.com>. They have a pretty big 
> fleet up there and are capturing at a pretty high frequency. Again. 
> Probably expensive but perhaps worth it?
>
> Maybe bnsf doesn’t want to talk but delays at bnsf should have 
> affected other trains using that line.
>
> Traffic cams near train crossings?
>
> Google traffic data showing traffic delays indicative of altered train 
> flow?
>
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 7:16 PM Brian O'Keefe <okeefe at cybermesa.com 
> <mailto:okeefe at cybermesa.com>> wrote:
>
>     There are many, many pix and video evidence collected by the legal
>     eagles that helped us up there but nothing that shows the tracks
>     beyond several hundred yards. I have looked at images from
>     GoogleEarth and there are two sidings, one east and one west, of
>     the conflict area. The one to the west is 6 miles away and the one
>     to the east is 3. So I'm looking for images of those with trains,
>     on that day at that time. A tough one.
>
>     Not sure why the smaller sized downloads are grayscale but they
>     are unreadable since they are so indistinct. Weird there. There
>     may be more pix from the state from that day as they provided some
>     for another case, same as mine. The trains they show are in the
>     Mandan yard, pointing the wrong direct (according to testimony)
>     and are empty coal cars while state's testimony stated they were
>     two trains heading east loaded with coal. all I need is a pic of
>     the next mile or two to the west where the "altercation" happened.
>     No trains, no case.
>
>     Thanks
>
>     On 11/10/18 3:33 PM, Jonathan Romero wrote:
>>     Protesting good practices for the modern age will probably
>>     involve launching a drone to ensure good record keeping.
>>
>>     Maybe fixed wing electric plus solar from the EFF?
>>
>>     Or Good Samaritan private pilots?
>>
>>     On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 5:26 PM Jonathan Romero
>>     <jonnyro at jonnyro.com <mailto:jonnyro at jonnyro.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Maybe have your lawyer request the info from BNSF.
>>
>>         They probably know exactly where those trains were.
>>
>>         I’d also see if flickr or any other image sharing site has
>>         images on that date or general location.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 5:23 PM Arlo Barnes
>>         <arlo.barnes at gmail.com <mailto:arlo.barnes at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>             Yeah, a time so specific will be hard to find.
>>             https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit shows various
>>             freely-licensed imagery from that area, and the most
>>             recent one from Bing aerial there is from October 14th,
>>             2016. Is there a bit of fuzz allowable on the time/date?
>>             —Arlo James Barnes
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             nmglug mailing list
>>             nmglug at lists.nmglug.org <mailto:nmglug at lists.nmglug.org>
>>             http://lists.nmglug.org/listinfo.cgi/nmglug-nmglug.org
>>
>>         -- 
>>         Jonathan S. Romero
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Jonathan S. Romero
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     nmglug mailing list
>>     nmglug at lists.nmglug.org  <mailto:nmglug at lists.nmglug.org>
>>     http://lists.nmglug.org/listinfo.cgi/nmglug-nmglug.org
>     -- 
>     _______________________________________________
>     nmglug mailing list
>     nmglug at lists.nmglug.org <mailto:nmglug at lists.nmglug.org>
>     http://lists.nmglug.org/listinfo.cgi/nmglug-nmglug.org
>
> -- 
> Jonathan S. Romero
>
> _______________________________________________
> nmglug mailing list
> nmglug at lists.nmglug.org
> http://lists.nmglug.org/listinfo.cgi/nmglug-nmglug.org
-- 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nmglug.org/pipermail/nmglug-nmglug.org/attachments/20181110/0d9f03c8/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3148 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nmglug.org/pipermail/nmglug-nmglug.org/attachments/20181110/0d9f03c8/attachment.png>