<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Well that helps me feel better that the 3.0 is no great shakes and I
would assume that it will all get upgraded eventually anyway. <br>
So is the consensus that I should do the apt-get dist-upgrade?
Sounds like it but just making sure. I plan to clone my drive to a
larger one anyway and then I can do the upgrade on this HD and risk
nothing really.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 01/28/2012 09:02 PM, kevinlowrie wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CD67F3C7-24A9-442C-9CA2-0B49275DF9E4@gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">The best article I found on 3.0 was in LinuxJournal last October/November for those with a subscription.
A quick search on google to find non-subscription based articles came up with this one from PCMAG.com <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2388926,00.asp">http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2388926,00.asp</a>
that sums it up best in the title for the impatient.
For the even more impatient, 3.0 came out 15 years after the 2.0 version released and Linus felt it was time... don't expect anything snazzier than you would from 2.6.39 to 2.6.40... it's the same upgrade (no 2.6.40 to be released...)
Another good summation of the versions here.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel</a>
And for the really curious. Here is the 7/21/2011 post from Linus releasing it with his words.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/21/455">https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/21/455</a>
cheers and happy haxin9!
kevinlowrie
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:kevinlowrie@gmail.com">kevinlowrie@gmail.com</a>
The prestige of government has undoubtedly been lowered considerably by the prohibition law...
A.Einstein
On Jan 23, 2012, at 11:52 , Mark Galassi wrote:
BrianO'Keefe> Hi all, I'm finding lots of "how-tos" on the web to
BrianO'Keefe> install the 3.0 kernel. Is this advisable as i am
BrianO'Keefe> running Ubuntu 10.10?
In general I would stick to the kernel updates from your distribution
unless you are doing very special things.
Note that it might be a bad idea to run 10.10 for so long: 10.10 is not
a "long term support" release, so it's probably best to keep it current.
See this page for a description of the LTS releases and expiration in
general.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS</a>
Vis-a-vis your updates, sometimes an explicit deliberate install of one
or two might then make apt-get install them all:
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get -u install linux-image-generic
and see if that changes things.
_______________________________________________
nmglug mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:nmglug@lists.nmglug.org">nmglug@lists.nmglug.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.nmglug.org/listinfo.cgi/nmglug-nmglug.org">http://lists.nmglug.org/listinfo.cgi/nmglug-nmglug.org</a>
_______________________________________________
nmglug mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:nmglug@lists.nmglug.org">nmglug@lists.nmglug.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.nmglug.org/listinfo.cgi/nmglug-nmglug.org">http://lists.nmglug.org/listinfo.cgi/nmglug-nmglug.org</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>