[nmglug] Satellite imagery

Brian O'Keefe okeefe at cybermesa.com
Sat Nov 10 16:16:09 PST 2018

There are many, many pix and video evidence collected by the legal 
eagles that helped us up there but nothing that shows the tracks beyond 
several hundred yards. I have looked at images from GoogleEarth and 
there are two sidings, one east and one west, of the conflict area. The 
one to the west is 6 miles away and the one to the east is 3. So I'm 
looking for images of those with trains, on that day at that time. A 
tough one.

Not sure why the smaller sized downloads are grayscale but they are 
unreadable since they are so indistinct. Weird there. There may be more 
pix from the state from that day as they provided some for another case, 
same as mine. The trains they show are in the Mandan yard, pointing the 
wrong direct (according to testimony) and are empty coal cars while 
state's testimony stated they were two trains heading east loaded with 
coal. all I need is a pic of the next mile or two to the west where the 
"altercation" happened. No trains, no case.


On 11/10/18 3:33 PM, Jonathan Romero wrote:
> Protesting good practices for the modern age will probably involve 
> launching a drone to ensure good record keeping.
> Maybe fixed wing electric plus solar from the EFF?
> Or Good Samaritan private pilots?
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 5:26 PM Jonathan Romero <jonnyro at jonnyro.com 
> <mailto:jonnyro at jonnyro.com>> wrote:
>     Maybe have your lawyer request the info from BNSF.
>     They probably know exactly where those trains were.
>     I’d also see if flickr or any other image sharing site has images
>     on that date or general location.
>     On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 5:23 PM Arlo Barnes <arlo.barnes at gmail.com
>     <mailto:arlo.barnes at gmail.com>> wrote:
>         Yeah, a time so specific will be hard to find.
>         https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit shows various
>         freely-licensed imagery from that area, and the most recent
>         one from Bing aerial there is from October 14th, 2016. Is
>         there a bit of fuzz allowable on the time/date?
>         —Arlo James Barnes
>         _______________________________________________
>         nmglug mailing list
>         nmglug at lists.nmglug.org <mailto:nmglug at lists.nmglug.org>
>         http://lists.nmglug.org/listinfo.cgi/nmglug-nmglug.org
>     -- 
>     Jonathan S. Romero
> -- 
> Jonathan S. Romero
> _______________________________________________
> nmglug mailing list
> nmglug at lists.nmglug.org
> http://lists.nmglug.org/listinfo.cgi/nmglug-nmglug.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nmglug.org/pipermail/nmglug-nmglug.org/attachments/20181110/1aade0ef/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3148 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nmglug.org/pipermail/nmglug-nmglug.org/attachments/20181110/1aade0ef/attachment-0001.png>

More information about the nmglug mailing list