[nmglug] stupid question #1

[Jason Davis]

678 at least ... has a web interface


On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 10:34, Tim Emerick wrote:
> I'd heard that the Cisco 675 and the 678 were great routers.  I think Qwest
> shied away from them because they aren't friendly for the average user to
> use.  I don't know why they don't put a web interface in them.
> 
> Tim
> 
> --- Gary Sandine <gars at laclinux.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 23:02 -0600, js at jasonschaefer.com wrote:
> > > Take the few extra minutes to  learn the cisco678. you will be rewarded 
> > > greatly.
> > 
> > That's interesting -- I also heard something like that from the owner of
> > a Los Alamos ISP.  He said they are great to work with (I have two of
> > them and after initial set up for bridged DSL have not had to touch
> > them) and that he was disappointed that they were discontinued.  I was
> > impressed by their functionality after watching him recover one (of
> > mine) from a failed firmware flash.
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > nmglug mailing list
> > nmglug at nmglug.org
> > http://www.nmglug.org/mailman/listinfo/nmglug
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 		
> _______________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now. 
> http://messenger.yahoo.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nmglug mailing list
> nmglug at nmglug.org
> http://www.nmglug.org/mailman/listinfo/nmglug